DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Chinese and Bilingual Studiesen_US
dc.creatorChersoni, Een_US
dc.creatorSantus, Een_US
dc.creatorLenci, Aen_US
dc.creatorBlache, Pen_US
dc.creatorHuang, CRen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-28T07:25:49Z-
dc.date.available2021-06-28T07:25:49Z-
dc.identifier.issn1574-020Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/90392-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.subjectArgument complexityen_US
dc.subjectCognitive modelingen_US
dc.subjectDistributional semanticsen_US
dc.subjectLogical metonymyen_US
dc.subjectPsycholinguisticsen_US
dc.titleNot all arguments are processed equally : a distributional model of argument complexityen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10579-021-09533-9en_US
dcterms.abstractThis work addresses some questions about language processing: what does it mean that natural language sentences are semantically complex? What semantic features can determine different degrees of difficulty for human comprehenders? Our goal is to introduce a framework for argument semantic complexity, in which the processing difficulty depends on the typicality of the arguments in the sentence, that is, their degree of compatibility with the selectional constraints of the predicate. We postulate that complexity depends on the difficulty of building a semantic representation of the event or the situation conveyed by a sentence. This representation can be either retrieved directly from the semantic memory or built dynamically by solving the constraints included in the stored representations. To support this postulation, we built a Distributional Semantic Model to compute a compositional cost function for the sentence unification process. Our evaluation on psycholinguistic datasets reveals that the model is able to account for semantic phenomena such as the context-sensitive update of argument expectations and the processing of logical metonymies.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationLanguage resources and evaluation, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-021-09533-9en_US
dcterms.isPartOfLanguage resources and evaluationen_US
dcterms.issued2021-
dc.identifier.eissn1574-0218en_US
dc.description.validate202106 bcvcen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera0670-n24-
dc.description.pubStatusEarly releaseen_US
dc.date.embargo2022.03.03en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.