DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Land Surveying and Geo-Informaticsen_US
dc.creatorKong, Jen_US
dc.creatorRyu, Yen_US
dc.creatorHuang, Yen_US
dc.creatorDechant, Ben_US
dc.creatorHouborg, Ren_US
dc.creatorGuan, Ken_US
dc.creatorZhu, Xen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-04T01:52:12Z-
dc.date.available2021-08-04T01:52:12Z-
dc.identifier.issn0168-1923en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/90618-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titleEvaluation of four image fusion NDVI products against in-situ spectral-measurements over a heterogeneous rice paddy landscapeen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume297en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108255en_US
dcterms.abstractSatellite image fusion methods that improve spatial and temporal resolution have significant potential to advance understanding of ecosystem dynamics in space and time. However, systematic evaluations of image fusion methods against in situ spectral data are lacking. Here, we used a suite of in situ spectral data collected at 60 elementary sampling units (10 × 10 m) covering 15 Landsat pixel (30 × 30 m) plots and one Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) pixel (250 × 250 m) throughout the entire growing season in a heterogeneous rice paddy landscape to evaluate four state-of-the-art image fusion NDVI products. They include the Enhanced Spatial and Temporal Adaptive Reflectance Fusion Model (ESTARFM), Flexible Spatiotemporal DAta Fusion (FSDAF), SaTellite dAta IntegRation (STAIR), and the CubeSat Enabled Spatio-Temporal Enhancement Method (CESTEM); the former three blended Landsat and MODIS data, whereas the latter combined CubeSats, Landsat, and MODIS observations. All fusion products showed strong linear relationships against in situ data when combining all spatial and temporal observations (R2: 0.73 to 0.93) although there were partly negative biases (–1% to –9%). These biases resulted from forcing data to image fusion algorithms, such as Landsat (–4%) and MODIS (–7%). Performance difference between fusion methods were considerably larger for spatial than for temporal variation. Furthermore, Landsat NDVI explained only 17–22% of spatial variation against in situ spectral data, which can be translated into weak performance of image fusion products to predict spatial variability in NDVI. Image fusion products that relied on spatial interpolation showed large biases (–15% to –30%) for a vegetation plot surrounded by mixed land cover plots. Our results highlight key sources of uncertainty and will be instrumental in improving satellite image fusion methods to monitor land surface phenology in space and time.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAgricultural and forest meteorology, 15 Feb. 2021, v. 297, 108255en_US
dcterms.isPartOfAgricultural and forest meteorologyen_US
dcterms.issued2021-02-15-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85098084686-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-2240en_US
dc.identifier.artn108255en_US
dc.description.validate202108 bcvcen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera0993-n04-
dc.identifier.SubFormID2331-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2023.02.15en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.