DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Chinese and Bilingual Studiesen_US
dc.creatorMomenian, Men_US
dc.creatorBakhtiar, Men_US
dc.creatorChan, YKen_US
dc.creatorCheung, SLen_US
dc.creatorWeekes, BSen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-11T07:31:20Z-
dc.date.available2021-10-11T07:31:20Z-
dc.identifier.issn1554-351Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/91243-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.subjectAction namingen_US
dc.subjectBilingualen_US
dc.subjectCantoneseen_US
dc.subjectLMEMen_US
dc.subjectMandarinen_US
dc.subjectMonolingualen_US
dc.subjectObject namingen_US
dc.titlePicture naming in bilingual and monolingual Chinese speakers : capturing similarity and variabilityen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage1677en_US
dc.identifier.epage1688en_US
dc.identifier.volume53en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3758/s13428-020-01521-1en_US
dcterms.abstractPicture-naming latency differs across languages in bilingual speakers. We compared the effects of key psycholinguistic variables on picture naming among two groups of Chinese bilingual speakers and Mandarin monolingual speakers. First, we asked bilingual and monolingual speakers to estimate the age of acquisition, familiarity, visual complexity, name agreement, and imageability of a set of object and action pictures in Mandarin and Cantonese. Next, we recruited 60 Cantonese-English speakers, 50 Mandarin-Cantonese bilingual speakers, and 30 monolingual speakers who named the object and action pictures in Cantonese and Mandarin, respectively. We observed variability in the effects of item-level characteristics among groups, suggesting an interaction between item-level and individual-level characteristics as predicted. This variability was higher in bilingual speakers who spoke similar languages (Mandarin-Cantonese) in comparison to those speaking more distant languages (Cantonese-English). Our results suggest that monolingual norms and bilingual norms capture the same amount of variability; however, grammatical class interactions with other variables are explained differentially by the bilingual and monolingual norms. We discuss the implications of our findings in terms of norming studies for timed picture naming and effects of bilingualism on language processing.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBehavior research methods, Aug. 2021, v. 53, no. 4, p. 1677-1688en_US
dcterms.isPartOfBehavior research methodsen_US
dcterms.issued2021-08-
dc.identifier.eissn1554-3528en_US
dc.description.validate202110 bcrcen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera0643-n01-
dc.identifier.SubFormID702-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2022.08.31en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.